XRP Price Suppressed By ‘Layered’ Manipulation, Pundit Alleges

Crypto Pundit Versan Aljarrah, founder of Black Swan Capitalist, a lengthy post on X on August 7 claims that the price of XRP intentionally restricted by a multi -sided structure that extends for exchange, organization and liquidity infrastructure. Aljan writes, that “framing the situation” is the largest financial cover -up “, that” the current price of XRP does not reflect its benefit, adoption, or strategic situation “, and claims that” the mechanisms of repression in force are layers and coordination and include strategically within the exchanges, regulations and chapters that support the free market. “

Is the XRP price treated?

Consolidate thesis To take enforcement measures in December 2020 against Ripple, Aljarrah describes the timing as deliberate and exposed to the investor. “This was not related to the protection of investors. It was the strategic economic war,” he says, stressing that “just days after XRP began obtaining a preposition on Bloomberg and other news means,” the lawsuit was filed “under direct orders from the central planners Wall Street.”

He connects to present what he describes as a momentum in the real -world payment tool for XRP, citing a Ripple relationship with Moneygram and other major global payment passages. According to Aljarrah, the issue “froze American institutional capital, and forced XRP to stop most trading platforms, and create uncertainty about its legal status,” he said that they attributed it to @jivalle2000 that the procedure was about “disrupting momentum and eliminating competition through organizational transgression.”

Related reading

The cash of market structure targets central exchanges. Aljarrah claims that whenever “liquidity begins in construction or the organic size begins to rise”, XRP faces clear patterns of coordinated resistance. ” The presence of “algorithm commercial robots, satirical simulation orders, and systematic washing circulation” that “constantly disrupts or creates a fake volume to hide the real demand”, and argues that if XRP is dealt with “like any other digital assets, this will show” sharp upward price movement with an increase in demand for the tool. “Instead, he says, the market” is rising frequently in the walls Artificial sale at main resistance points and large -sized transactions that have no vague effect at all on the immediate price “, which he calls” no correction “.

Aljarrah devotes special attention to how he believes that the activity of institutions payments is isolated from the discovery of public prices. Liquidity flows describe on demand for Ripple as settling in XRP “but (being) intentionally stops the radar of traditional market activity.” In telling it, “The volume is directed in one way or another through OTC offices, the axes of private liquidity, and the arranged corridors to reduce slip and reduce exposure to the market.” He claims that this directive enables XRP to “work as the origin of a global bridge without leading to an increase in visual prices in public stock exchanges.” “I am not sure how to do this, but this may be related to it?” – Readers refer to an external video clip as a possible clarification.

Related reading

Then he puts the effects of the alleged microscopic structure in what it depicts as a structurally restricted American market during the critical years of adoption. “Coinbase, Kraken, and other main stock exchanges that were deleted and XRP restricted after the lawsuit of the Supreme Education Council, which led to the arrival of the arrival of retailers effectively, while aljarrah, while Ripple was claimed globally, especially across Asia and the Middle East”, “left the American participants” under undesirable supervision. ” It frankly describes a dynamic: “The United States was playing both sides, and there is evidence of this.”

XRP dependent in the dark?

The post also develops a narration of deviation between the intended function of XRP and the monitored commercial relationships. Aljarrah says that XRP “was treated as a long -term benefit tool for a new cash system, unlike 99 % of the encryption market”, however, its prices are still linked to “violent and speculative assets like $ BTC and $ ETH, and there is no real benefit.” The “institutional accumulation behind the scenes” claims, stressing that while “retail investors were kept in the dark and banned from the main markets, the founding players have received early arrival through private investment vehicles, sandwiches and the corridor test across the border.” To summarize this opinion, he insists on: “The flows are real, however none of them appear on public plans. Meaning, XRP is adopted. It is used. But the price is managed.”

Dispute features are prominently the level of the prey. “You cannot accept the role of XRP in settlements in an actual time, the integration of the central bank, and the adoption of global transfers at a rate of 3 dollars without recognizing the extent of control over it,” he writes, adding, adding, it will not guarantee that there are three dollars. It closes by confirming the deliberate design associated with the current state of the game: “There is a deliberate framework designed to suppress XRP until the infrastructure is designed completely and the Legacy systems ready for immigration.” The open issue he raises – “How long will repression continue while the same institutions are preparing to turn the key?” – It is a final provocation.

The Aljarrah publication provides a comprehensive claim linking legal time, exchange behavior, liquidity directing, and institutional access to one result: visual upgrade in relation to benefit. The claims are framed as assurances instead of accompanying the basic application book data, corridor level sizes or documentary evidence. But his position, with his own words, is unambiguous: “XRP is adopted. It is used. But its price is managed.”

At the time of the press, XRP was traded at $ 3.33.

Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com