
Pittovo encryption analyst raised a discussion after calling for a long run Coiplation against the SEC case It was never an actual battle, but the distraction that was carefully shown. he He says Fintech and its supporter formulated the image of “David Vs. Goliath” to fight American organizers to hide its basic mission, and build US -backed global payment bars under the cover of the organizational conflict.
The SEC case was a smoke screen for government -backed expansion
Pumpius argues that Ripple was not from the outside many people believed. From the beginning, she built her technology Banks and institutions, Do not retailers or amateurs. I offered semi -zero fees, immediate settlement, compliance with the ISO 2002 correspondence standard before it is required, the type of features Built For large -scale financial infrastructure. He says this is not a profile to start the garage that fights the system, but it is for a network designed to replace the global payment correspondence system.
Ribel says Partners list Its link appears to the government. These include experimental projects for the Federal Reserve and Central Banks in Bhutan, Palau and Montenegro, and the Middle East payments and Asia, and relations with American defense banks such as BNY Mellon. For Pumpius, this is the imprint of the punishable expansion, not rogue innovation.
the A lawsuit with SECIn his opinion, serve as the perfect cover. While Ripple headlines were “in a problem”, the company has quietly signed more than 1700 contracts and NDAs with major financial institutions. Many of them were with foreign partners, which created the appearance that the company “fled” from the United States in reality a plan To open the payment corridors abroad first, then return the infrastructure to the United States as soon as it is ready.
XRPL in Washington Blockchain: From money to identity control
According to Pultius, the end of the game exceeds payments. It claims that the United States intends to use XRPL as the backbone of the Blockchain reserve network, which transforms control of traditional banking systems into a government -related professor’s book. He says, a major part of this plan is rlusdRipple’s Stablecoin “Pilot”. It is completely compatible with the United States, and is designed for institutional custody, and connects directly to XRPL. Once activated, RLUSD can serve as the origins of the local bridge, while Xrp He deals with global settlements.
If it is xrpl You can move money, It can also transfer any assets, including sensitive identity information such as DNA. It warns that the vital symbol of vital data would give those who control the influence of the professor’s book not only on funding, but on the personal identity itself.
The idea is to make the project seem to resist the system, and allow it to grow freely outside LightsThen reveal a minute alignment once Infrastructure Very firm for the opposition. By the time the audience understands the network scope, says Bloor, the bars are already present.
In his opinion, Ripple was built Global financial bars Under the guise of combat organizers, while the United States guaranteed that technology will work smoothly at home. From the payments to the origins of the real world and identity data, the XRPL can become the Blockchain arm in the state. For Pumpius, the lawsuit was never the battle; the expansion The task was.
Distinctive image from Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com

Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
The post Was The Ripple Vs. SEC Lawsuit Just A Distraction? Pundit Claims US Government Owns XRPL first appeared on Investorempires.com.