A jury of 12 people, including a member who celebrated its ninetieth birthday, circulated this week in a complex case of the Roman storm, co -founder of Tornado Cash. They condemned the storm on one of the charges of managing money that is not licensed to send business, while unable to reach a decision on other charges.
According to the court documents issued on Thursday by Judge Catherine Villa, jury in the storm case sent several requests to obtain information before they were announced via deadly on two charges.
Among the judge’s messages are requests to obtain texts from the certificate of many witnesses, clarify what led to the indictment, and a specific inquiry on the portfolios listed in North Korean sanctions.
After closing the data in the trial that was wrapped on July 30, jury circulated for a week before announcing that they were blocked to money laundering and penalties. Although every request to obtain information or clarification came with a delay in a decision, it appears that there is no proposal for voice affiliation until Wednesday morning.
“We have done our best to continue trading and reaching a unanimous decision, but there are jury in the stone with their decision even after we made a goodwill effort to consider all the controversy, and we are on a dead end.”
Related to: The Roman Storm is condemned by Tornado’s monetary, putting a “dangerous precedent”
Why did the jury dizzy money launder?
According to the jury’s charge, the 12 individuals had to agree with a no room for doubt that the storm joined a “agreement or understanding” with others to commit money laundering, and participated “intentionally and deeply” in its illegal purpose.
The jury said: “The proper sense will tell you that when people actually undertake or agree to enter into a criminal plot, a lot is left to an unprecedented understanding.” “The conspirators usually do not reduce their writing agreements. They do not publicly broadcast their plans.”
The detailed instructions associated with information requests may be explained in part some of the difficulties faced by jury in an attempt to form an opinion whether the role of the storm in the service of mixing encryption is a plot to commit money laundering and violate US sanctions.
The names of the jury were revised from all the court files, but the judge indicated that one of them celebrated her ninety birthday while circulating.
The hearing of the ruling in the storm on one felony was not determined as of Friday. It is also unclear whether the United States government intends to return the vicinity of the co -founder of the monetary travels on the remaining charges.
Cointelegraph connects with Storm’s Legal to comment, but he did not receive a response at the time of publication.
magazine: How can the ETHEREUM Treasury “Defi Summer 2.0” excite
The post The Jury’s Journey To The Roman Storm Verdict first appeared on Investorempires.com.
