In a large -scale interview with Bitcoin magazine, Microstrategy CEO, Michael Sailor, intensified five years of companies experimenting with a blatant mechanical scheme almost what he calls the “Bitcoin End” game: an unprecedented stored accumulation of assets as a digital head, then makes a new set of credit markets on top.
“The Endgame is that we are accumulating a trillion dollars from BTC and then we grow this capital by issuing more credit”, Silor He said. The maneuver has not been a speculative side bet, but as the next logical stage of corporate financing, with bitcoin reshaping as “digital energy” and public budgets that have been re -conceived as engines revolving from the return of excessive tools in the association.
Bitcoin Games Plan in Silor
Silor framing is racist. He sewed BTC in long proportions of energy breakthroughs-from fire and steel to oil and electricity-gets that the monetary origin properties are better to understand as a means of transporting economic “energy” through time and space quickly and quickly.
“Bitcoin is hope because Bitcoin represents digital energy,” he said. “A way to transfer energy through time, through space … the following form.” To Silor, the institutional misunderstanding of this transformation is not a mistake but the essence of this opportunity. “I would like to say that 95 % of decision -makers in the financial world are still not embraced or truly understood the idea of digital energy,” he said, adding that the delay in digestion in society is a typical of the model transformations: “Bitcoin develops faster than society can digest.”
At the heart of the Playbook book, it is limited. Deal with Bitcoin as the monetary base-“digital gold”-then secure it as “digital credit” in familiar models of capital markets: transformers, favorite, market-like paper, long-term bonds. He said: “If you create a company that buys Bitcoin and accumulates one billion dollars of bitcoin, I have one billion dollars in digital capital. What can I do with it? I can issue digital credit.”
In the Silor model, the ownership rights of the company that repeatedly and repeatedly became the “digital property rights”, which were designed to excel the basic asset through the conservative financial leverage and the management of Tenor:
He insists that the competitive group is not the secretary of other bitcoin bonds, but rather the vast stock of credit in the twentieth century-mortgage, companies, and sovereignty-at a low price or pent-up and often secured by neglect or non-liquid guarantees. “What they compete for is the current credit tools in the capital market,” said Silor.
The stadium to Saves is an explicit matter on an equal matter: “Better Bank” is the one who comes out for the duration and pays a spread on the current situation, Fiat, and is funded by excessive bitcoin in the plural. It has drawn it in terms of operational conditions: raising shares, buying bitcoin, then selling short -term credit, “This only raises the period to one month … and gives people 500 basis points more than the price free of risk in the capital market where it sells credit.”
The scale it imagines is not modest. Sailor walked through the judicial states, where financial repression or low -policy rates were inflated, on the pretext that mature markets with pent -up returns are ripe soil for “pure digital credit exporters”. Switzerland and Japan were examples.
Ambition, however, is the world. “What if there is a hundred trillion dollars of digital credit and … 200 trillion of digital capital,” thanks that such a structure can remain excessive in the tour rather than drifting to fractures. It also pressed the geopolitical logic: Treasury bonds and stock exchanges with good capitalism, miners and the “first line of economic defense”, pressure and bitcoin normalization within local bases groups in the way in which the current industries operate. “If you want to win the monetary war, you need institutions that control all capital and … the government’s support,” he said.
Bitcoin Treasury will be banks
Silor was frank that the adoption of companies was already doubled. The Group of Public Budgets circulated to the audience that carries BTC from one company in 2020 – Microsrate – follows to “two or three … then 10 … then 20 … then 40 … About a year ago there was 60 … this spread story with the statute of the statute – which was originally designed in iOS, Android, Windows and Associath ARDUSTS – Support – Support – Support – Support At the level of the operating system, it is the other clear signal that “digital energy” has merged with trade tissue.
When asked about distributive criticism – that the companies that bring together individuals – Silor, the hypothesis, claiming that institutional flows had greatly accumulated for the first holders. He said: “When we participated, Bitcoin was trading $ 9,000 with a currency with a currency … Today at a value of $ 115,000 from Bitcoin,” he attributed a lot of appreciation for the demand for companies and ETF. “This means that 93 % of profit … went to individuals who owned bitcoin before the companies’ participation.”
It can be a military rhetoric – Celor calls “a protocol war” – but its operating discipline depends on avoiding the traps that destroyed miners in the last session. The short and costly obligations that were placed on declining devices, in his opinion, the deadly mismanagement. The original model of the Ministry of Treasury is a hero who prefers capital structures from mid -toly luminous associated with basic origin. He said: “If you get an average or long -term loan and buy one of the assets estimated at 30 to 60 % per year, it is likely to be fine,” and the diversification refused to integrate and purchase operations as a value to destroy value compared to the “ideal partner” to buy more BTC in “one times revenue”.
Silor on US policy
Sailor also pushed the horizon of politics and infrastructure, as it predicted the legitimacy of the assets linking with the distinctive assets, while emphasizing that the “greatest regulatory clarity” is still the BTC position as a digital commodity that can be subject to public budgets and hit the credit. The new political position in Washington was summarized as a supporter to make the United States a “great power of bitcoin global”-not by nationalizing miners or obtaining property rights shares, but by generalizing custody, guarantee, conjunction, integration of the operating system, and tax treatment. He said: “They want financing companies in the United States to lead the road … and financial companies in the United States to drive the road in digital assets, adopting digital capital and bitcoin.”
For a community that is used to discuss Halves, the retail rate, or the inference of the series, the Saylor game centers in another place: indexes, coupons, curves, and the return curves-all of them are balanced at the top of a new cash base. It is a corporate financing thesis in the heart of Bitcoin. It multiplies as a provocation to the councils and financial manager in each currency system: “Every company in the world is in any capital market, it is always better to buy bitcoin as capital assets.” The rest is widespread implementation. “Getting a trillion dollars from increasing guarantees by 30 % annually, exporting $ 100 billion in credit annually, as it grows 20, 30 % per year,” Sailor concluded. “We are building a better bank.”
At the time of the press, Bitcoin was traded at $ 116,492.
Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com
Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
The post Saylor Unveils His Bitcoin Endgame To Upend Global Finance first appeared on Investorempires.com.
