In a message to the southern province of New York (SDNY) today, the general prosecutors presented in Samurai wallet case They stated that they did not obscure the evidence of acquittal and asked the judge to the case to refuse the defense request to obtain a hearing to discuss the late disclosure of the main information obtained by the general prosecutors. FINCEN Nearly two years ago.
Earlier in the week, the defense stated in a letter They have learned that Fincen “strongly suggested” that the Samourai portfolio did not serve as a money transfer due to the non -product nature of the product in a discussion between some FINCEN members (more about these two members down) and prosecutors on August 23, 2023.
This information appeared thanks to a Pharmacist a movement That defense was presented. (This type of movement has yet been named Brady against Maryland The case of the Supreme Court, which took place in 1963. It established the case Pharmacist The rule, which states that evidence of defense is provided so that it can be used as part of the due legal procedures.)
Given that one of the two accusations faced by Samourai’s developers is a conspiracy to operate unlicensed money transfer work, some felt that this new information that reaches light can be reasons for rejecting the case.
No separation, no hearing
However, today’s prosecutor’s message stipulates that they have no intention to drop the case, and they do not feel that the session requested by the defense is justified.
“There is no basis for a listening session, and there is nothing to treat: the disclosure itself shows that the government has not violated PharmacistThe prosecutors stated the letter.
Prosecutors added that they are planning to follow up in the case, with a highlight of the second charge: the plot to commit money laundering.
As it was claimed, Samurai washed more than $ 100 million of crime revenue that arose from, among other criminal sources: illegal dark markets, such as the Silk Road and Hydra Market; many wire fraud and fraud on the computer that deprived the victims of money, including Intrative Spraval, Speer scheme, and multiple cells; prosecutors wrote.
Reducing the inputs from Final
Moreover, the general prosecutors claimed that the fact that they revealed their contacts with Fincen is not related to the case, because a lot of charged behavior does not depend on the Fincen regulations.
They also reduced the importance of what FINCEN employees who spoke with the public prosecutors: Kevin Oakon (head of the VIPs department in Fincen and emerging technology in the Poisonment and Compliance Department) and Lorina Valnte (employee in the Vensen Policy Department when I spoke with the prosecution).
Public prosecutors pointed to OCONNER and Valente’s views as “individual, informal, and mobile”, adding that they had already submitted “fundamental email correspondence between the prosecutor and FINCEN members related to the invitation of August 23, 2023”.
They continued to mention that “Fincen’s individual employees did not speak on behalf of Fincen, and they did not provide Fincen’s opinion, and that” they had no sense of what Fincen would decide whether this question was presented to their Final Politics Committee. “
no Pharmacist violation
In the last part of the letter, the general prosecutors confirmed that they did not violate the legal norms in not providing specific details of their call on August 23, 2023 with Fincen until this point in the pre -trial process.
“The record shows that there was no Pharmacist The prosecutor wrote: “Violation in this case.”
They added: “The government revealed the contents of this unofficial conversation to defense before the proposals before the trial, and about seven months before the trial in response to the request of this information.” “Nothing is required.”
Finally, according to a The second circle The ruling, which is also mentioned by the prosecutors in the letter, as long as the defense owns Pharmacist Time evidence for effective use, the government has not prohibited the defense of due legal procedures.
What comes after that?
It is not clear that Judge Berman will respond to today’s message from the prosecution.
The opening introduction to the defense of this day was originally decided, but it was returned to two weeks. One week after the opening suggestion, the claim will respond to the opening movement of the defense.
As of the last before the trial, the prosecution is scheduled to provide an expert disclosure on July 15, 2025, and the defense is expected to be submitted to them by August 8, 2025.
The experiment is scheduled to start on November 3, 2025.
If you want to donate to the Samurai Defense Fund, you can do this P2P Rights Fund.
The post Prosecution In Samourai Wallet Case Affirms It Did Not Violate The Brady Rule first appeared on Investorempires.com.
