It is the possibility of a sovereign individual who seems to bother the nation -state today. The perception of this strange threat was the growth of political genealogy that, in generations since the American revolution, has become increasingly equality of the state in society while incurring the individual as an enemy of both. This equation was deeply anxious to the founders of the American Republic, who described a new national project specifically to prevent violations of the established and Persian pies – an aristocracy – which considered itself the legal guardian forever, of the best fate and interests of people. The political question was activating the founders of America, therefore: How can the people have autonomy without creating a genetic category of conservatives? How can it be enough tensionIf not conflictIt remains between the state and society that the rule of law is preserved without becoming a prison?
The founders invented a genius solution to this problem based on a revolutionary hypothesis: that the rights of the individual, not the rights of the state, are essential to a free society. (1) In other words, people have rights; Governments have no rights. Governments have powers, however only Those forces that are explicitly authorized by the people who represent them. In a more accurate phrase, people have the total and unpredictable rights, while the state has only those powers that have been explicitly enumerated. Any measures taken by state agents outside their mentioned powers are the rape of the rights of the people. People must protect these explicit borders and can take the aforementioned forces at any time.
In other words, American founders reflected the dominant political assumptions in their cultural world: the persons who had to prove that they deserved rights, that they were innocent before the law, or that they had cleared themselves of the inherited obligations towards the state. Instead, it was the state that carried the burden of proof: that it was worthy of confidence; It has the ability to take certain action; That any person or entity was guilty under the law; Or that the powers of war should be practiced with the blood of people and the treasure. Tangible, this means that during the era of the American Constitutional Agreement, when the discussion between federalists and anti -federalists sparked a training consensus that the American state will not have its own power, its own money, nor an army on its own. The American constitution states that all these things will actually be loaned from people, who have established true sovereignty.
But things have changed deeply since the constitution is ratified. America did not create a complete army quickly after that; This army has been involved in an almost uncommon war – more than a hundred foreign and local conflicts, declared and unannounced – at that time. While most Americans today are likely to be aware of the widespread struggles in which their nation-the revolutionary war, civil war, and global wars, for example-are likely to be surprised by the majority of the wars in which the United States participated. During the nineteenth century, these wars were mostly fought against the Indian American tribes as part of the batch to colonize the West, while during the twentieth century they were mostly waged against socialist and communist movements all over the world. In turn, conflicts were prosecuted in the twenty -first century, under the banner of the war on terrorism, and recently that the opponent’s countries contained. Although the constitution gives Congress the only power to declare war, in practice, Congress has only announced the war in a few major conflicts: the 1812 war, wars against Mexico and Spain, and wars against a specific silver in the first and second global wars. The rest was launched through a form of executive procedures by one side, whether by presidential decree or by identifying military officers.
Just as the US government seems to have its own army, it seems to have its own money. In 1913, Congress approved the sixteenth amendment, giving him the right to impose permanent income taxes on the American people; Real estate taxes, gift taxes, capital profit taxes and corporate taxes are followed shortly, while other permanent forms of taxes have been provided in contracts since then. These funds have been widely mentioned in the name of “government revenues” instead of “people’s money”. But the federal government does not limit its spending on the people’s money; Instead, it is widely borrowed, and supports an inflated administrative condition whose agencies are so many and not so much that there is no reliable reference for the number. Federal Registry, Federal Register online, US government guidethe Source book for the executive agencies of the United StatesThe unified agenda of regulatory procedures and federal organizational holidays, FOIA.gov, and USA.gov are all a list of different numbers and definitions on a large scale for agencies. (2), (3) These agencies act as bodies on both the setting of rules and implement their bases, and all the three branches of the government (legislative, executive, and government) collapse in one of their own operations. This eliminates the checks and balances developed by the authors of the constitution to restrict the power of the state, and subject the American people to an increasing group of laws that they had no role in making and they have no electoral capacity to change or cancel. As a result, the illusion is created that the government has its own authority.
But while the military conflict, taxes, and bureaucratic rule are all clear aspects of the state’s authority, it is supported by a platform that looks very natural and medium today to the point that it is largely passed without anyone noticing: a financial system in which central banks issue, supply and unimaginable price management. These currencies work as basic funds used by commercial banks, in turn, as reserves to provide loans. Commercial banks and central banks around the world constitute a network of financial brokers who share information with each other about each transaction that passes through their networks – which are also shared with military government agencies, intelligence and conditions in governments and international organizations all over the world. The government’s views of the economic activity of every person and organized anywhere in the world are not actually restricted to any special laws or constitutional provisions related to the search for and seizure of assets. This alliance between the banking authority and the police force that was enjoyed during the early twentieth century, while the banker’s revolution – a successful revolution that a few of them realized that it had occurred.
Satoshi leaves are now available in Bitcoin magazine store -I ask for a normal cover today or in advance for the Limited LibRary version, charging mid -June 2025.
(1) He read the original draft of Thomas Jefferson for the Declaration of Independence. Independent (He added confirmation), through this equal creation, they derive inherent and inherent rights, including preserving life, freedom, and pursuit of happiness. See Thomas Jefferson, “Image 1 of Thomas Jefferson, June 1776, approximate draft of independence declaration”, Congress Library, https://www.loc.gov/resource/mtj1.001_0545_0548/ ?sp=1.
(2) Clyde Wayne Crews, “How many federal agencies exist?” Forbes5 July 2017, https://www.forbes.com/sites/WayNECREWS/2017/07/05/how-many-fedral-gencies-exist- Want-drain-thamp-swamp-ntil
-We-know/? S = 535830391AA2.
(3) Molly Fischer, “What is the Federal Agency?” Federal Agency Directory, Louisiana State University libraries, 28 March 2011, https://web.archive.org/web/20130518150541/http://www.lib.lsu.edu/gov/fedagengydef.pdf.
The post An Excerpt From The Satoshi Papers: A Nation Of Individuals? first appeared on Investorempires.com.
